We are always talking about music and music publishing, but on closer inspection, these terms are words that tour around loose. These words sent with some intention dead, and yet have no specific criteria. They are like other words that we can with serious intentions, even at best a subjective meaning, words like "God", "soul" and "normal".

Especially when there is music with the words 'new', let the arrogant Assuming that we are talking about the new generation of our music, as if previous generations should not have and talk about music again. The beginning of 1700, at the end of life of JS Bach, Where we only see the music that fact, the appearance. JS Bach's sons were among the supporters of this new music we have today as a classic.

The music of JS Bach's Day, the Baroque is a complex form of> Music, we see another example of music that a de-evolution of species and part of a popular movement. As a student I had a professor of music history, whose pet theory was that everything was JS Bach after only a material recovery, as they were. If you look at the musical harmony from the perspective of one, is hard to argue against what he said.

Even in today's world we see a number of complaints filed byan artist against another, saying it was his song "demolished". This happened in the days of classic rock, and understandably, because the rock was so obviously derivative of the old big-band sounds.

Although there are a dozen or more labels because, as was New Wave, Punk, Grunge, and not much movement from the usual chord progressions. The Beatles were very glib about songs is that they had "stolen" or stolen, that is, had theChord structure of some songs, and changed the rhythm and words. An obvious example is "There were Bells" and "Little Child", which appear in the same album!

A recent article in the Times, defended the process and says that if an artist makes some changes to a song and personalized with his own vision and interpretation, so that (have) version of the song.

Ironically, this is to take more in line with the composers in the baroque seemed. Bach believednothing to change Vivaldi violin concertos for harpsichord music concerts as he has nothing of its nature, very different played on instruments, as was originally written.

All this raises the question, is it really such a thing as new music. Maybe it's just the music audiences.